I argue that while many U.S. policymakers and analysts are disillusioned by China's growing repressiveness at home and assertiveness abroad, and accordingly supportive of efforts to "get tougher" on Beijing, they disagree significantly over how to proceed.

[2/6]
I relied on many individuals' work to inform the piece, and I want to credit them here.

I quote (in order of appearance) @ewong and @AnaSwanson, @RichardBushIII and @ryanl_hass, @AaronFriedberg, @LizEconomy, @FareedZakaria, @eosnos, @davidpgoldman, @RollandNadege

[3/6]
, @EvanFeigenbaum, Daniel Tobin, @DaveShullman, @jessicacweiss, @AndrewSErickson, David Skidmore, Michael Beckley, @YasmeenSerhan and @kgilsinan, and @jacobstokes.

[4/6]
I draw on reporting by @jchaltiwanger; @JKynge, @KatrinaManson, and @JamesPoliti; @Kate_OKeeffe, @MichaelCBender, and @ByChunHan; and @jenhab and @TracyKWilkinson.

I cite research by @kat_devlin, @lauraruthsilver, and Christine Huang.

[5/6]
And, finally, I link to commentary by @dandrezner and @neilthomas123.

The upshot of the piece is that any "consensus" should, at a minimum, articulate what strategic objectives the United States seeks to achieve vis-à-vis China.

I'd be grateful for any and all reactions.

[6/6]
You can follow @Ali_Wyne.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: