@realDonaldTrump
@GenFlynn
@dbongino
@T_S_P_O_O_K_Y
@TomFitton
@JackPosobiec

Sometimes we just need to ask the right questions. For example: In what universe is it possible that @JoeBiden is the Democrat Party nominee?

Unifying Theory:

THREAD

Let's acknowledge the Obama Administration abused the US Intel apparatus for many years. They & others who were heavily invested in keeping this fact concealed did everything they could to keep @realDonaldTrump from getting elected, including by illegaly spying on Trump.

Trump gets elected. Obama et al sets their hair on fire. Plan devised to parallel construct their way out of severe legal jeopardy by finding anything, (dossier), & everything, (Illegally collected Flynn/Kislyak call etc), to investigate their way "through" Trump or "over" Trump.

"Through" Trump meaning to at worst render his administration impotent until Dems back in power. "Over" meaning best case scenario, (for them), of bringing Trump down completely. Impeachment, Indictments, Mueller, Jail the whole nine yards. Whatever it takes.

Inauguration coming. Time is short. Things getting quite serious now. Witch hunt for Trump associates not bearing enough fruit. What to do? Pull out all the stops. Collect on Flynn, (& probably many others), with ZERO legal justification. Kislyak FISA not justification for Flynn.

January 5th meeting: It's all or nothing. Put ALL cards on the table. War gaming for how to use illegally collected Flynn/Kislyak call/transcript is focus of meeting. Plan hatched to parallel construct a baseless case on Flynn.

Understand: Everything is parallel construction. Let me say it again. Everything is parallel construction. All of it. Spygate beginning to end, including all Comey et al testimony = building plausibility & justification for Flynn collection=parallel construction, (aka all lies)

Obama et al even revised EO 12333 sec 2.3 for two key reasons. 1) Allow broader dissemination of "raw" signals intelligence to other agencies in the IC. Muddies up the waters so it's much harder to pinpoint source of "future" leaks. 2) Language in EO is dual purpose.

cont....

First purpose was that language in the EO seems to establish that White House was appropriately excluded from Intel it should not have if looking "back" at Obama Administration.

cont....

Second purpose was that language in the EO seems to establish that White House "should be", (possibly inappropriately), excluded from Intel that it SHOULD have if looking "forward" to Trump Administration.

Isn't it interesting that the revision to EO 12333 sec 2.3, supposedly signed by AG Lynch on 3 Jan 2017, and by DNI Clapper on 15 Dec 2016, was released to the press on 12 Jan 2017, the SAME day Biden "unmasked" Flynn AND the SAME day WAPO publishes Flynn/Kislyak call?

Sure seems like a LOT of "coincidences" suddenly began converging around @JoeBiden all at once, doesn't it? Why would that be and how does the "unifying theory" bring it all together?

Good question. Lets continue.....

NSA Rice's now infamous self addressed "by the book" email was declassified yesterday, (19May2020) & it's interesting for many reasons but lets focus on just a couple. First, isn't it interesting that Rice claims Comey "affirmed" he was doing everything by the book? But was he?

It seems quite likely nothing was being done "by the book" but lets move to the next point which is that it's also interesting that Rice wrote the email 15 days AFTER the actual meeting itself. Hmm...Very interesting, right?

What do you suppose happened between 5 Jan, 2017 & 20 Jan, 2017 that might have promoted Rice to suddenly feel it was necessary to write such a self congratulatory email on behalf of Obama et all for doing everything "by the book?" I mean why? "Something" prompted this email.

Could it have been that there was a minor uproar developing in the swamp infested halls of DC as well as in the press over the Flynn/Klisylak call first revealed by WAPO on 12 Jan, 2017? It's almost as if "some" in the Obama administration didn't WANT that call leaked.

Why would "some" in the Obama admin NOT have wanted the existence of the Flynn/Kislyak leaked to the press? Because in most situations the information used to parallel construct an illegal and/or improperly predicated case against someone needs to remain "secret" in perpetuity.

If "most" of the Obama Admin wanted the call kept secret then who do you suppose might have been in the room during the January 5th White House meeting that was most likely to screw that up? Could it have been world renowned gaffe master Joe Biden? I'm just asking.

Seems quite plausible Joe made a "command decision" to leak the existence of the call to the WAPO probably through a surrogate. Once it was out confusion ensues with a slight mixture of panic in Obama Admin. "How has this happened", they must have wondered?

cont....

Joe hypothetically answers, "It was ME everyone! I did it and you can all thank me later! Boy just look at that! Flynn's name is everywhere now and his secret call is out in the open. He'll never survive this."

Obama, Rice, Brennan, Clapper, Comey and no doubt the White House counsel must have crapped their ever loving pants! A collective, "WHAT HAVE YOU DONE JOE?"

Can you imagine the confused look on his face?

All hands on deck is invoked at this point. White House counsel tells Rice to type up her "by the book" email while Comey is left devising "plan B" to make the best of a bad gone to worse situation. Then "send over a couple agents to see Flynn violating all protocol" is hatched.

All along "targeted" unmasking were used as cover for justifying how so many Obama admin officials and political appointees just "coincidentally" knew when & where to look for Flynn's name to unmask him so their "knowledge" "actually gained" by illegal "raw" SIGINT was justified.

The whole thing was parallel constructed from beginning to end but these things can easily get messed up when put into action. Lots of moving pieces and chances are always high something goes wrong. Could it have been a case of "oh no Joe"?

But it gets even better. Remember, unifying theory here so we have to figure out how it's possible that Joe is the Dem nominee. Apparently Biden realized somewhere along the way that if he went down they all go down.

Voila. Presidential Candidate for 2020 Quid Pro Joe is born. Clowns A-Z run against him but eventually step aside once the show has gone on long enough. The rest as they say...is under investigation.

@threadreaderapp Please unroll ...