Can I say something?

Comfort breeds weak men.

And I think this is the case with some of this young new-atheists of developed countries and Nigerian twitter middle class.

And I know this when I hear the mindless Levity with which they hold some of their beliefs.

Consider...

A person is Ok to assert that since we are a product of chance, we are just DNA robots and have no freewill.

They are proud to assert no objective morality either.

The logical conclusion is that people aren't really accountable for any actions.

they're not scared to say these

They live in societies when most of the people don't believe that.

But if these new atheists get their wish and enough people believe these things, what do they think will happen?

Seriously

The 20th century is yesterday in the grand scheme of history.

The Holocaust and gulags

... All those ideas are products of 19th century intellectual parlour debates that flirted with atheism.

The result was hundreds of millions destroyed.

What do new atheists think will happen if enough people truly believe they don't have freewill and therefore not accountable?

These guys are like children.

Like a child who hand is out on the stirring of the car while daddy is driving. This child thinks he's driving and he's laughing.

These guys are so weak in their thinking that it has not occurred to them that when they're arguing against God...

... They're implicitly agreeing that they have a freewill to argue, to choose or not to choose what they believe.

Well statistics show that many atheists go back to faith in their older years so, let's chuck it up to youthful thiughlessness.

But seriously. These guys need...

...to think more deeply.

That whole quip "if you need God to make you moral, you're a bad person" is so childish an idea.

So absent minded. So naive.

And incoherent. What does bad mean?

Do you really think Stalin was not sure he was doing the right thing?

Let me rest abeg.