Obama's United Nations Amb. Samantha Power testified that she had no recollection of even a single such request to unmask Flynn. She made at least seven. When Sessions said that he had “no recollection”, Democrats called for his prosecution for perjury... https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/18/did-samantha-power-commit-perjury-it-depends-if-the-sessions-standard-applies/

...Will the Sessions’ standard apply to Power, or is this another example of standards changing with the affiliation of the accused? Of course Biden is not Kavanuagh and Power is not Sessions. Suddenly sexual assault and perjury becomes a more challenging and nuanced question.

I do not view either controversy as a strong perjury case. My problem is the relative easy shown in these cases for Democratic members and analysts in shifting from one position to the other. The only common denominator is not just political affiliation but political convenience.

...One would think that this was one unmasking that would stand out. After all, it occurred just before Power left with the Obama Administration and involved one of the top and most visible Trump officials. It also involved one of the highest ranking Trump officials ...

...While Power and others did not expressly seek Flynn’s name, they asked for the unmasking of the individual who was speaking to the Russian ambassador on policy changes. Flynn was unmasked and then someone leaked that information from a classified investigation to the media.