Bells' Objection To Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. False or Fraudulent Proof of Claim
Filed in the US BK Court District of Maryland
Case No. 19-16679 NVA
Motion Below = 18 Pages w/ 13 Exhibits
NMS 2012 Consent Judgment Trumps 2014 SJ Lacking Subject Matter Jurisdiction https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OhfVmFwozqSZr9horciNdGOKGUArpg4-/view?usp=sharing

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. Non-Responsive Motion to Our Objection to Dyck's False or Fraudulent Proof of Claim
Thomas J Kokolis's Ex parte Collusion & Obstruction of Justice using court employees is a violation of Federal Law
No Exhibits
Avoids NMS Consent Decree https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ky5hmYTniS-_t9D07HcAgjU9BBfZIIm_/view?usp=sharing

Bells' Reply In Support Of Bells' Objection False Claim NO.1

Dyck-O'Neal, Inc. Avoids the National Mortgage Settlement Consent Decree.
Dyck Lacked "Subject Matter Jurisdiction" to File its Claim in The Maryland Judiciary

Motion = 19 pages w/ 13 Exhibits https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y0x9Zm8S8i5Zd096jRUFPti6rcSyzE9S/view?usp=sharing

Below is the Motion to Reconsider Order Overruling Bell's Objection To & Allowing DYCK's False Proof Of Claim No. 1

The Motion below makes Dyck's Obstruction of Justice Clear and Convincing in our BK Case No. 19-16679 NVA
@TheJusticeDept
@FBIBaltimore https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-ESJP9HFwN260riytUrlw7wIdsThPp6z/view?usp=sharing

Thomas J Kokolis used counterfeit documents to extort money never owed. @BankofAmerica has provided mortgage statements proving paid in full on August 4, 2009
I was also a PARTY to the NMS Consent Judgment in 2012 two years prior to Dyck's unlawful judgment.

Supremacy Clause

State Courts that don’t recognize Federal Consent Decrees ie "National Mortgage Settlement" are unconstitutionally impairing a parties’ rights. NMS CJ is a Contract that must be recognized by State Courts.

Consent Decrees once signed create collateral estoppel & res judicata