Why was there an unmasking request 11/30/16, in advance of @GenFlynn and Kislyak calls — which were used as a pretext go go after Flynn? Was it Kushner who pushed the calls? Or did someone push Kush? This is very important.

This is the question #QAnon asks.

Where is Peter Strzok?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/what-mueller-report-says-about-jared-kushner-ivanka-trump-donald-n995866

@GenFlynn was the target.

The entity who set him up, set up 3 things: 1) the phone call with Kislyak 2) the spying on the phone call 3) the FBI inquiry even after it was closed.

FBI-CIA nexus.

LOGIC:

Whoever entrapped @GenFlynn, was working FBI-CIA, & told Kislyak to call.

All parties around calls should be interviewed.

Get to the bottom of it, and free Flynn.

Look for the pattern.

Whoever did this, the Ukraine phone call was the same MO.

A cutout whistleblower covered for the real operatives.

They set up a call, and try to create the narrative of quid pro quo, mainly through “wrap up smear” media leaks.

So now we have another couple of profile points.

It’s a cabal operator (think “Palpatine’s Revenge)

Who was on the game chats?

@mareq16

S=Susan Rice

GT outpost=Georgetown outpost, a “One of [Their] Resistance SCIF’s in DC”

https://twitter.com/mareq16/status/1255620458038394886?s=21

(S could also be Strzok or someone else)

“Juules” is clearly a boss, possibly Obama or Hillary since it’s a female name.

Susan Rice is a professor at American U, not far from Georgetown (4 miles)

Rice served as UN Representative and former national security rep; Samantha Power served as ambassador to the UN

Rice covered for Benghazi

Rice could have put in the order under Power’s name.

Remember this? 2017: Susan Rice denies leaking Trump associate intel, defends unmasking requests | Fox News https://www.foxnews.com/politics/susan-rice-denies-leaking-trump-associate-intel-defends-unmasking-requests

Rice’s name isn’t on any of the unmasking requests @CBS_Herridge released because the requests were not technically HERS.

That is how she could state, without lying, this: “She said she never sought to unmask the names of Trump associates in intelligence reports "for any political purposes" or spying purposes.”

The emphasis is on HERSELF as the one whose name is there. It’s not her. It’s a different party, possibly POWER.

They each can say they didn’t do it.

This is the lie, like the Benghazi YouTube video lie: “This is not anything political as has been alleged," Rice said. "The allegation is that somehow Obama administration officials utilized intelligence for political purposes. That is absolutely false."

She blames “the community”

“The intelligence community made the determination whether the identity of that American individual could be provided to me," Rice said.”

Oh my God, sources — “The Tuesday interview with MSNBC occurred after sources told Fox News that Rice HAD SOUGHT TO UNMASK THE NAMES OF TRUMP TEAM MEMBERS caught up in INCIDENTAL SURVEILLANCE OF FOREIGN TARGETS. Those names were then widely disseminated.”

Who would have reached out to Kislyak, that he would have listened to, to contact @GenFlynn?

Someone associated with international diplomacy.

Samantha Power
Susan Rice

He would have interpreted that as Obama smoothing the way for Trump.

Who is close to Obama? Rice and Power - also through Cass Sunstein.

I think we have the answer.
Rice and Power tag teamed the unmasking request and getting Kislyak to call @GenFlynn.

Obama and Brennan spearheaded it.

Once again: Kushner is blamed by circumstance.

Once again: Kushner didn’t do anything wrong.

All people are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

@threadreaderapp unroll

@threader_app compile