why LARRIES and HARRIES are NOT the same.

; a very eye-opening thread.

i find it funny how harries compare larries' tweets to their tweets. larries tweets are fluff, we mostly talk about things that actually happened in the past and yes we do have some theories but most of them are accurate and respectful. our tweets are 90% pure fluff and energy

then, there's them, who tweet about H's d*ck, c*m, having s*ex with him, him f*gering them or e*ting them out..
so, they call us out for shipping two people romantically when we don't even post sexualizing tweets about them and they can't see that the problem is actually theirs?

i do know some larries can post sexualizing tweets, not everyone is a saint, but they are the minority and those tweets don't even get attention on the larrie fandom, we, larries ask them to delete cause we know it's disrespectful. meanwhile harries' tweets get +1000 likes.. wtf?

harry has stated he's incredibly uncomfortable with being sexualized. and don't come at me saying larries are the ones who sexualize him cause it's not true.. it's not the same to ship someone with another person that to fucking tweet about eating his d*ck 7 times per day.

plus, i would like to remind y'all that last time harry did a following spree he followed 12 larrie acc. why would he follow them if he got uncomfortable with what they tweet? tbh, inside all the shit on stan twitter, i believe larries' tweets are what bother him the less..

END OF THREAD.
i hope harries get to see this cause that's really the only reason why i wrote it.
anyways, hope you agree and liked it! TPWK x