I will lay out my understanding in this thread.
First, intel officials were initially barred under our constitution and laws from capturing innocent Americans on wiretaps and surveillance of foreign officials and terrorists.
First, intel officials were initially barred under our constitution and laws from capturing innocent Americans on wiretaps and surveillance of foreign officials and terrorists.
Then, they said, âWell, we need to sometimes capture those innocent U.S. citizens âincidentally,â but we wonât store their information. Weâll protect their American rights.â
Then, they said, âWell, we will store the info for just a little while, but we will carefully control access and we will âmaskâ or hide the identities of the U.S. citizens so they cannot be used for political or nefarious purposes.â
Then, they said, âWell, we need to store the names & info of the innocent U.S. citizens longer than we first said. And it will go in a database. But donât worry, in the very rare instance when names are âunmaskedâ, it will be a careful, contolled process only a few can do.â
They added, âNobody will be able to âunmaskâ simply because they are curious or suspicious; there will have to be extremely important and well documented reasons directly related to national security. This will be extremely rare.â
Now, some are saying: âWhatâs wrong with unmaskings? There are thousands and thousands of them every yearâŠâ
(I was told back in 2015 that this process was increasingly being abused by bad actors.)
(I was told back in 2015 that this process was increasingly being abused by bad actors.)