Thread:

It's a cliche that India reforms only in a crisis. So of course changes to the labour laws announced by states last week were hailed as great reforms.

But can you call what UP did – junking most labour laws – a reform?

On The Political Fix: https://thepoliticalfix.substack.com/p/the-political-fix-why-are-indian
Criticism also came from RSS' labour wing, the BMS, and this article on ORF, hardly a place you'd expect to see bleeding-heart commentary:

Reducing regulatory cholesterol is one thing. But suspending all laws is like throwing the baby with the bathwater. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/covid19-yogi-adityanath-attempts-reforms-delivers-regulatory-chaos-uttar-pradesh-65918/
Some have lauded what Madhya Pradesh has done – with more targeted alterations to the law – compared to the wrecking ball that UP Chief Minister Adityanath pulled out.

Others have long called for India to change the way it regulates labour https://twitter.com/srajagopalan/status/1258604939548516354
But even Madhya Pradesh's actions – such as not recognising unions for key sectors – raise red flags, and many have argued against the idea that that more flexible labour norms leads to better investment.

See this thread: https://twitter.com/ShankarGopalak/status/1259367034418159616
There's more on this, including links, plus lots of other analysis and tid-bits on The Political Fix, my weekly newsletter on Indian politics and policy, which turns up in your inbox every Monday: http://thepoliticalfix.substack.com 
You can follow @RohanV.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: