For some context, WA just two years ago settled a landmark school-funding case (McCleary) that found the state violated its constitutional duty to pay for the full cost of a basic education here, leaving school districts to rely on local property taxes to fill in the gap
WA added billions to its K-12 budget, largely through a tax "swap" that lowered and capped local levies while raising a statewide property tax. BUT that made (especially low-income) school districts more reliant on the state for funding which could hurt during an economic crunch
If WA cuts funding for K-12, it seems inevitable that there will be pressure to lift those levy lids — which would have the unintended consequence of increasing inequity between property-poor and affluent school districts. A double-edged sword, as @margueriteroza has put it
There's plenty of questions to be answered: If the state property tax hike paid for all that new money in education, how much will the loss of sales and other taxes hurt schools? Will lawmakers spare their K-12 budget while spreading the pain to higher ed, health care, etc.?
And most interesting to me: If lawmakers offer financial relief by lifting the local levy lids, does that lay the foundation for a "McCleary 2.0" lawsuit? (Between 1980 and 2010, WA slowly let levies overtake the majority of K-12 spending, so this is worth watching for a while)
You can follow @nealtmorton.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: