It's interesting to see how pieces from people attacking the @MuslimCouncil, are full of vacuous statements or outright misleading nonsense.

The latest attack is from the Henry Jackson Society in Spiked - let's break this piece down. https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/05/13/who-does-the-muslim-council-of-britain-speak-for/
The headline is related to misrepresentation of a 14 year old poll cited in the piece.

Whilst MCB only claims to represent our affiliates, here are 2 recent polls, where the MCB's approval rating exceeds all political parties.

Sources: https://twitter.com/miqdaad/status/1003204646473781248
The beginning of the article tries to attack the MCB for its critique of Phillips.

What's so interesting is there is literally nothing substantive & no evidence laid out against our critique. For those interested, see my thread outlining concerns here.

https://twitter.com/miqdaad/status/1236935771015327744
He then devotes close to 3 paragraphs to the only real evidence he brings to the table to critique the MCB

This is a c. 2 page intervention by an academic within a 74 page report by @cfmmuk, which puts forward a subtle view on linguistics (his area of expertise).
The report covers major issues and more subtle issues - you may not agree with it all, but the broader theme (Islamophobia in the media) an issue of real importance.

This thread explains why. https://twitter.com/miqdaad/status/1107559963910643712
You can follow @miqdaad.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: