*damning* towards the end about the "number theatre" of the government& #39;s press conferences: "completely embarrassing; we& #39;re told lots of big … precise numbers, actually not trustworthy communication of statistics"

This BEFORE the "R + No. of infections = threat level" debacle… https://twitter.com/TimandraHarknes/status/1259574238597570560">https://twitter.com/TimandraH...
I really do not envy the government, or anyone having to make decisions in all this, and I suspect that the response has been less dreadful than many think; but the attempts to communicate the uncertainty, and trust the public to understand that uncertainty, have been woeful
this is a fair point; the "equation" is clearly meant to imply that the R and the number of infections will be used in combination to determine the threat level, and I& #39;m pretending to assume it& #39;s a real equation, which no one sensible will do. It just annoyed me. https://twitter.com/MarcusMunafo/status/1259763583837179910">https://twitter.com/MarcusMun...
oh no, this is turning into a thread, but:

funnily enough, tune into Radio 4, June 12 at 11am! For (among other people) Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter, of top-of-this-thread fame, talking to me about uncertainty! https://twitter.com/TimandraHarknes/status/1259764067683774464">https://twitter.com/TimandraH...
anyway. To conclude this accidental megathread, my experience from years of writing "actually it& #39;s more complicated than that & we don& #39;t know anything" pieces has been that people are pretty comfortable with uncertainty if you talk them through it. Maybe they could give it a try
You can follow @TomChivers.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: