Read on Twitter
thinking about old argument with an Internet Communist
me: as described, your Proposed Communist Society would probably still have inequality in it, because there are a lot of x-st people
ic: no
me: why not
ic: the proletariat would rule everything
me: as described, your Proposed Communist Society would probably still have inequality in it, because there are a lot of x-st people
ic: no
me: why not
ic: the proletariat would rule everything
me: but rn the proletariat is x-ist?
ic: ppl who run things would not be x-ist
me: how can you guarantee that?
ic: re-education of the proletariat
ic: ppl who run things would not be x-ist
me: how can you guarantee that?
ic: re-education of the proletariat
me: i don't think that would work, but even if it would, who decides the education standards?
ic: the proletariat
me: but what if the proletariat who decides that is, to some degree, x-ist as it is now?
ic: they would not be
(continue ad infinitum)
ic: the proletariat
me: but what if the proletariat who decides that is, to some degree, x-ist as it is now?
ic: they would not be
(continue ad infinitum)
it felt very weird that she couldn't admit that in order to have a world with her ideals as law she would have to decide who she thought was best at making the rules
