Attorney General Barr’s Perversion of Justice

The attorney general is turning the Justice Department into a political weapon for the president.

Now more than ever, become politically involved to save our constitutional republic. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/09/opinion/sunday/michael-flynn-william-barr-justice-department.html

“History is written by the winners,” AG Barr, said when asked how he thought future generations would assess his decision to drop all criminal charges against Michael Flynn, who had pleaded guilty twice to breaking the law. “So it largely depends on who’s writing the history.”

In service to Trump, Barr is abusing his power not to write, but to erase important lessons of US history.
The Watergate scandal...led to reforms meant to ensure an independent DOJ, one faithful to the law rather than to the Oval Office.

The nation had seen firsthand how much harm a president with no respect for the rule of law could do — particularly when he used the Justice Department, under a compliant attorney general, to protect allies, punish adversaries and cover up wrongdoing.

Among the key reforms were stronger transparency and ethics rules, like the creation of independent inspectors general to root out waste, fraud and abuse in the executive branch. (Mr. Trump has been firing inspectors general he thinks are not loyal to him.)

There were also new limits on presidential power, like the Cong. Budget and Impoundment Control Act. (Trump broke that law last year, according to the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office, when he withheld hundreds of millions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine.)

To Barr, these reforms were obstacles to a vision of a virtually unbound executive. For decades, he has pushed to give presidents — Republican presidents, anyway — maximum authority with minimal oversight.

In a 2018 memo criticizing the Russia investigation, he argued that the president “alone is the Executive branch,” in whom “the Constitution vests all Federal law enforcement power, and hence prosecutorial discretion.”

According to Barr, Trump’s prosecutorial discretion includes cases involving the president’s own conduct.

If you’re having trouble distinguishing Mr. Barr’s vision of the presidency from the rule of a king, you’re not alone.

“George III would have loved it,” said Douglas Kmiec, who led the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush.

“Bill Barr’s America is not a place that anyone, including Trump voters, should want to go,” wrote Donald Ayer, who served as deputy AG under the first President Bush. “It is a banana republic where all are subject to the whims of a dictatorial president and his henchmen.”

Barr’s America is the one we’re now living in. The DOJ, in the midst of a presidential campaign, has become a political weapon.
Having absorbed the lessons of Watergate, mainstream Republicans once balked at the politicization of the DOJ — even by Republican presidents.

When President George W. Bush’s attorney general Alberto Gonzales fired eight United States attorneys because they were not aggressive enough in prosecuting Democrats, the outrage was bipartisan, and he was forced to resign.

But today’s Republicans, who could be most effective in defending the integrity of American justice, appear either too afraid of Mr. Trump or too eager for short-term partisan advantage to confront the danger to the country.

Barr’s decision to drop the charges against Flynn may be his most egregious abandonment of his role as the public’s lawyer, but it’s certainly not the first.

Last year, a month after he was confirmed to his post, Barr stood before the American people and misrepresented the contents of the long-awaited report by Robert Mueller, the special counsel who investigated ties between the Trump campaign and the Russian government in 2016.

The Mueller report’s 448 pages documented extensive evidence of those ties, as well as multiple instances of lying and obstruction by Trump and other top government officials. Barr’s 4-page summary claimed the opposite — that Mueller had found no collusion or obstruction.

Mueller protested Barr’s 4-page summary yet weeks passed before Americans could see the report themselves and discover just how much Barr had twisted its findings to benefit Trump.

Note: Barr also perjured himself b/f Congress on Apr 9 & 10 when he denied Mueller’s protest.

In March, a federal judge called Mr. Barr’s characterization of the report “distorted” and “misleading,” and said his “lack of candor” called his credibility into doubt.

But Barr didn’t stop there. He also rejected a report by the DOJ inspector general finding that there was sufficient evidence to open the Russia investigation. He referred to the investigation as “spying” and ordered a criminal inquiry into its origins.

He referred to the investigation as “spying” and ordered a criminal inquiry into its origins. He intervened in the prosecutions of two of Mr. Trump’s top advisers, Mr. Flynn and Roger Stone, for whom he recommended a lighter sentence than his own prosecutors had sought.

And Barr declined to open a criminal investigation into last fall’s whistle-blower complaint against Trump, saying it did not qualify as an “urgent concern.” The complaint ultimately led to Trump’s impeachment.

Last month, Mr. Barr went on Fox News and called the Russia investigation “one of the greatest travesties in American history,” and said, “We’re not dealing with just mistakes or sloppiness, there was something far more troubling here; and we’re going to get to the bottom of it.”

With these remarks, Mr. Barr appears to have violated Justice Department policy against publicly discussing current investigations.

Barr’s insistent attempts to undermine the legitimacy of the Russia investigation and absolve Trump of any wrongdoing...violate DOJ policy against taking any actions that could be seen to have a partisan political purpose, especially in an election year.

The damage Mr. Barr is doing extends beyond policy violations. He has weakened the morale of the department by undercutting career prosecutors — men and women who devoted their lives to the rule of law.