Read on Twitter
Watched LP debate 5
I love Hornberger's commitment to principle but won't answer Qs properly. Dismissive, off-topic & repetitive. He's not interested in viable party, hitting voting #'s. I don't trust his ability to frame things in a way non-LP voters understand. Unfortunate.
I love Hornberger's commitment to principle but won't answer Qs properly. Dismissive, off-topic & repetitive. He's not interested in viable party, hitting voting #'s. I don't trust his ability to frame things in a way non-LP voters understand. Unfortunate.
I don't like Judge Gray. His "I was in the military" x20 irked me. That doesn't makes you a good political rep. Stop harping on it. I don't like the stipend policy or his campaign strategy. He seems to favor status quo, overly incremental in reform. His Q to Jo was pure stupid.
Vermin Supreme presented himself well. He was concise & articulate. I like him. Concrete plan to gain votes. I just disagree that people will understand his satire or know we're in on the joke. It could likely damage LP image like Aleppo & stripper man. Maybe that's ok.
Jorgensen was interesting. She seems to understand how to frame things to non-LP but not compromise principles. She knows details on how to campaign & has solid strategy. I didn't like her manner much at 1st but she grew on me. No name recognition was valid criticism though.
Amash isn't awful but he's not great. He's in the public spotlight & has failed to sell LP values all this time. He does have LP stances but he's been part of the status quo & seems as if he's too used to it to radically change it. He's maybe too incremental, like Gray.
