Read on Twitter
Because that’s where I’m at...
You want actual receipts?
Kewl - I can do that.
Supplemental Flynn Withdrawal of Plea thread
January to yesterday’s shitshit
linked
highlighted
categorized
And in chronological order https://twitter.com/File411/status/1217258609987543040?s=20
Kewl - I can do that.
Supplemental Flynn Withdrawal of Plea thread
January to yesterday’s shitshit
linked
highlighted
categorized
And in chronological order
https://twitter.com/File411/status/1217258609987543040?s=20
2nd Supplemental Flynn thread
- isolated the exact moment Flynn went off the rails
- to wit the Govt filed a clarification
-stated Flynn was a “co-conspirator”
Govt unsuccessfully prosecuted his business partner
Flynn’s plea deal https://twitter.com/File411/status/1148757904008339457?s=20
- isolated the exact moment Flynn went off the rails
- to wit the Govt filed a clarification
-stated Flynn was a “co-conspirator”
Govt unsuccessfully prosecuted his business partner
Flynn’s plea deal
https://twitter.com/File411/status/1148757904008339457?s=20
Your 3rd Supplemental Flynn-DOD thread
DOD-OIG Investigation
DIA letter to Oversight
DIA’s confirmation that Flynn never sought approval
Payment Docs
Bring it - you want to defend Flynn - that’s on you
Me? Not so much https://twitter.com/File411/status/1258803796123189248?s=20
DOD-OIG Investigation
DIA letter to Oversight
DIA’s confirmation that Flynn never sought approval
Payment Docs
Bring it - you want to defend Flynn - that’s on you
Me? Not so much https://twitter.com/File411/status/1258803796123189248?s=20
Wrong Bar # = invalid
Whomp
Whomp
haaaaalllppp
“that the ID number under Shea's name was a clerical oversight”
<whispers> multiple career DOJ official totes snort laughing at TiiiimmmaAy https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/09/politics/filing-error-michael-flynn-case-reversal/index.html
Whomp
Whomp
haaaaalllppp“that the ID number under Shea's name was a clerical oversight”
<whispers> multiple career DOJ official totes snort laughing at TiiiimmmaAy https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/09/politics/filing-error-michael-flynn-case-reversal/index.html
Shea using Former AUSA Lin’s #
Exhibit A Jan 7, 2020 sent memo
Exhibit B May 7, 2020 Shea’s sig
Exhibit C/D DDC Local Rules July 2019
cc @lauferlaw @DirkSchwenk
@Muskie_Medic see where I’m going with this? /s/ auto populated when using ECF...duh
https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/LocalRulesJuly_2019.pdf
Exhibit A Jan 7, 2020 sent memo
Exhibit B May 7, 2020 Shea’s sig
Exhibit C/D DDC Local Rules July 2019
cc @lauferlaw @DirkSchwenk
@Muskie_Medic see where I’m going with this? /s/ auto populated when using ECF...duh
https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/LocalRulesJuly_2019.pdf
Not helping Tiiiimmmeeey
“reviewing the filed pleading, government counsel observed that that the D.C. Bar number for United States Attorney Timothy J. Shea was incorrect. Mr. Shea’s correct D.C. Bar number is 437437. The undersigned can aver that the error was not intentional”
“reviewing the filed pleading, government counsel observed that that the D.C. Bar number for United States Attorney Timothy J. Shea was incorrect. Mr. Shea’s correct D.C. Bar number is 437437. The undersigned can aver that the error was not intentional”
OH SHITTLESTIX
Judge Sullivan
“....at the appropriate time" he will set a schedule for the submission of any amicus curiae briefs.”
Judge Sullivan
“....at the appropriate time" he will set a schedule for the submission of any amicus curiae briefs.”
Short answer of what this minute order means:
Judge Sullivan still holds the power. It is clear that he has a lot of questions for both @TheJusticeDept Acting AUSA Shea, AG Barr, the FBI and Flynn
So for now it’s hurry up and wait. Judge Sullivan is a very pragmatic. Be patient
Judge Sullivan still holds the power. It is clear that he has a lot of questions for both @TheJusticeDept Acting AUSA Shea, AG Barr, the FBI and Flynn
So for now it’s hurry up and wait. Judge Sullivan is a very pragmatic. Be patient
People are missing a few BIG Clues in Judge Sullivan’s MO:
Clue # 1 cited this case
Jin v. Ministry of State Sec 557 F. Supp. 2d 131, 136 (D.D.C. 2008)
case re FISA
Clue # 2 he cited Judge ABJ re Stone matter
cc @lauferlaw @DirkSchwenk @LouiseMensch
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1barVKrQqm1v-aQ8-YKv_bCvooT6-NQrY/view?usp=drivesdk
Clue # 1 cited this case
Jin v. Ministry of State Sec 557 F. Supp. 2d 131, 136 (D.D.C. 2008)
case re FISAClue # 2 he cited Judge ABJ re Stone matter
cc @lauferlaw @DirkSchwenk @LouiseMensch
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1barVKrQqm1v-aQ8-YKv_bCvooT6-NQrY/view?usp=drivesdk
don’t be fooled that these are random citations, they are NOT:
Judge Amy Berman Jackson has observed, "while there may be individuals with an interest in this matter, a criminal proceeding is not a free for all." Min. Order USA v. Stone, No. 19-cr-18 (ABJ) (D.D.C. Feb. 28, 2019)
Judge Amy Berman Jackson has observed, "while there may be individuals with an interest in this matter, a criminal proceeding is not a free for all." Min. Order USA v. Stone, No. 19-cr-18 (ABJ) (D.D.C. Feb. 28, 2019)
Flynn’s QAnon legal team is freaking out
Sid you opened the door to a special prosecutor
“Watergate Prosecutors’ Notice also referred to this Court’s Local Criminal Rules, LCrR 57.6..applied for no relief other than permission to file an amicus brief”
https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/doc1/04507820802?caseid=191592
Sid you opened the door to a special prosecutor
“Watergate Prosecutors’ Notice also referred to this Court’s Local Criminal Rules, LCrR 57.6..applied for no relief other than permission to file an amicus brief”
https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/doc1/04507820802?caseid=191592
Whomp
Whomp
Flynn motion denied as Moot - re Judge Sullivan’s previous minute order
Whomp
Flynn motion denied as Moot - re Judge Sullivan’s previous minute order
Judge Sullivan also asks the newly appointed judge to review if “Flynn could be held in criminal contempt for perjury”
Weird it’s almost like some of us told you:
Huh so did Flynn lied to TWO JUDGES
cc @lauferlaw @DirkSchwenk I think I called this, no?
https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/doc1/04517822651
Weird it’s almost like some of us told you:
Huh so did Flynn lied to TWO JUDGES
cc @lauferlaw @DirkSchwenk I think I called this, no?
https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/doc1/04517822651
Here I saved you $.20 because I care
Trump-Barr-Flynn thought they almost got away with this miscarriage of justice.
Never ever lose faith in our Article III judges they might actually surprise you. To those who said I was wrong about perjury - LLOLs
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jPPCEIe1jsA0HOUfGpfbu5efHdloS8vq/view?usp=drivesdk
Trump-Barr-Flynn thought they almost got away with this miscarriage of justice.
Never ever lose faith in our Article III judges they might actually surprise you. To those who said I was wrong about perjury - LLOLs
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jPPCEIe1jsA0HOUfGpfbu5efHdloS8vq/view?usp=drivesdk
AHAHAYAYAHAHAH - did you notice the statute - it’s not the “traditional perjury” - this is specifically for lying to a Court
18 U.S.C. § 402 - Rule 42 look it up - me has to get dinner on the table for my little dragons
Me is laughing
18 U.S.C. § 402 - Rule 42 look it up - me has to get dinner on the table for my little dragons
Me is laughing
Gawd 18 USC §401 (not 401) this is what happens when I’m cooking dinner & tweeting and yelling at my little dragons
Here read the USAM about 18 USC §401
It is delightful /snort https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1739-offenses-related-obstruction-justice-offenses
Here read the USAM about 18 USC §401
It is delightful /snort https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-1739-offenses-related-obstruction-justice-offenses
Also let’s revisit what was particularized in Flynn’s December 2017 statement of facts
Now I have to go because I think I brunt the casserole goddamnit
. https://twitter.com/File411/status/1260664767926226952?s=20
Now I have to go because I think I brunt the casserole goddamnit
. https://twitter.com/File411/status/1260664767926226952?s=20
Gawd this is WHY I explained to you last night that Judge Sullivan’s minute order should have been parsed out and carefully dissected
I TOLD YOU THAT JIN CASE MATTERED and explained Sua Sponte too
I don’t understand why people can’t keep up https://twitter.com/File411/status/1260340767794618375?s=20
I TOLD YOU THAT JIN CASE MATTERED and explained Sua Sponte too
I don’t understand why people can’t keep up https://twitter.com/File411/status/1260340767794618375?s=20
Those wondering who John Gleeson is -
The Flynn case isn’t over until the judge says it’s over https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/11/flynn-case-isnt-over-until-judge-says-its-over/
The Flynn case isn’t over until the judge says it’s over https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/11/flynn-case-isnt-over-until-judge-says-its-over/
Are people really questioning the assertion that Flynn lied to 2 separate Federal Judges?
Nov 2017 Flynn’s allocution before Judge Contreras (look at what’s highlighted)
https://www.justice.gov/file/1015026/download
The transcript to Flynn’s 2nd allocution before Judge Sullivan
https://twitter.com/File411/status/1190358808297721856?s=20
Nov 2017 Flynn’s allocution before Judge Contreras (look at what’s highlighted)
https://www.justice.gov/file/1015026/download
The transcript to Flynn’s 2nd allocution before Judge Sullivan
https://twitter.com/File411/status/1190358808297721856?s=20
Irrespective of how you might spin this it is a binary choice
-Trump said he fired Flynn for lying
Pence said Flynn lied
Yates said Flynn lied
Either way Flynn lied either Flynn lied to 2 Article III judges
Look up 18 USC §401 in the context of Rule 42 https://twitter.com/File411/status/1260707516180201472?s=20
-Trump said he fired Flynn for lying
Pence said Flynn lied
Yates said Flynn lied
Either way Flynn lied either Flynn lied to 2 Article III judges
Look up 18 USC §401 in the context of Rule 42 https://twitter.com/File411/status/1260707516180201472?s=20
Acting AG Yates sworn testimony
In open session she explained why Flynn lying re the calls with Kiskyak presented a clear Nat Sec risk
The Russians knew Flynn lied & he was susceptible to being blackmailed hardly a position we’d want our NSA to be in
Next? https://twitter.com/File411/status/1229885248336515073?s=20
In open session she explained why Flynn lying re the calls with Kiskyak presented a clear Nat Sec risk
The Russians knew Flynn lied & he was susceptible to being blackmailed hardly a position we’d want our NSA to be in
Next? https://twitter.com/File411/status/1229885248336515073?s=20
