1). Q. Do you know who built the Red fort or Lal Qila?
Ans: All sickular liberal history books will always mention that it was built by the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan!
This is nothing but a straight lie, the Red fort was built hundreds of years before the birth of Shah Jahan!

2). The Red fort of Delhi was originally built by Maharaja Ananga Pal Tomar the second, who was a successor of Abhimanyu of the Mahabharata and the maternal great grandfather of Prithviraj Chauhan! At that time the fort was named Lal Kot!

3). The fort of Lal Kot was originally built by Maharaja Ananga Pal Tomar the second in 1060 A. D. as a part of his plan to establish the city of Delhi! And Shah Jahan was born as late as 1592!

4). Actually Shah Jahan tried his best to erase and destroy the architecture of the building in such a way as to remove the Hindu sculptures in order to establish the falsified story that he was the original builder of the fort.

5). D falsity of d myth of d Sickular liberal historians hve been established by d fact dat a book Tarikh-i-Ferozshahi which is based on d history of FerozShahTughlaq written at his time states in Volume3,page 160dat in 1296Alauddin Khilji on his return to Delhi

6).frm his military expedition as a General of his uncle Jalal-ud-din Khilji entered d Kushk e Lal or RedPalace (Lal Mahal)wid his soldiers&took rest there!
Both d Akbarnama&d Agni Puran it's clearly stated dat MaharajaAnangaPal constructed d beautiful&magnificent city ofDelhi,

7).also250yrs be4ShahJahan at1398 d lame Jihadi Tamarlane mentioned d city of oldDelhi which is also a construction by ShahJahan.
At a specialMahal in d LalQila der is a structure representing d head ofa Varaha or a Boar,it's mouth isAn opening whichWater is supplied in2d palace.

8). Can this be called an Islamic symbol or a proof of a Hindu structure! There is also a statue of an elephant at a gate, the Rajput rulers were known for their love for elephants while Islam does not permit building statues of any living animals.

9). There is also a tank in d LalQila called the Kesar Kund on the floor of which lotus flowers are carved out which is definitely a Hindu sacred symbol, the name Kesar Kund itself is a Hindu name and the kings used to take bath in the tank in saffron water since time immemorial!

10). D funniest part is der is no minar or Gumbaz in d fort which is a definite part of Muslim architecture& aren't found both in d Diwan-e-Aam&Diwan-e-Khas!Der is also a picture of a weighing scale which is not a part of Muslim culture4d Mughal rulers who looked down on der 99%

11). Hindu subjects,but definitely goes with the Rajput architecture! The inner architecture of both the Diwan e Khas and Diwan e Aam are exactly similar to the inner structure of the old palace of Amber (Jaipur) which was constructed in 984 A. D.

12). Even today you can find a red Jain temple and a Gauri Shankar temple only metres from the Lal Qila, which were both constructed hundreds of years before Shah Jahan. The Chandni C market near Lal Qila regions are still Hindu majority areas!

13). Most of d old houses around d place r definitely Hindu designed, why would Shah Jahan allow buildings with Hindu structures around his fort?
There are no Islamic stone engravings in Lal Qila stating that Shah Jahan was the builder of the fort, the only engraving states,

14)."GarFirdaus barrueh zameen ast,
Hamin ast,hamin ast,hamin ast!"
If der is ny heaven on dis earth,it's here,it's here,it's here!
Clearly dis unnamed stone engraving doesn't prove dat ShahJahan build d fort2any right thinking individual

15).if his vision is not blurred under d left Sickular liberal ideology!

https://www.booksfact.com/archeology/red-fort-delhi-originally-built-raja-anangpal-tomar-1060-ad.html.

16). #Concluded
But clearly there are lots of evidences to strongly prove that the Lal Qila is a Hindu structure, but all these evidences for some unknown reason have been negated by the congress governments!