The world should’ve listened to @WHO, you say? About which point?

No human-to-human transmission?

A thread with some more guesses, because @WHO certainly said some things, just not sure any are worth believing. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.barrons.com/amp/news/world-should-have-listened-to-who-on-virus-director-01588003803

Or maybe about you had meant China’s commitment to transparency? Is that a valuable insight from @WHO? @anticorruption seems to disagree. https://www.transparency.org/cpi2019 

Or for sharing information? Something that, as @WSJ has reported, took precious days as the virus spread across the globe? https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-it-all-started-chinas-early-coronavirus-missteps-11583508932

Or for China’s “impressive” response? A suggestion thoroughly debunked by @Axios? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.axios.com/timeline-the-early-days-of-chinas-coronavirus-outbreak-and-cover-up-ee65211a-afb6-4641-97b8-353718a5faab.html

Or the idea that China has reduced the number of #coronavirus deaths? Which @axios also debunked? Is that what you mean @DrTedros?

Maybe you mean that a travel ban isn’t necessary? That advice? Given global travel has shut down, I would imagine a few people disagree with you there.

Perhaps the Chinese propaganda talking point that we shouldn’t refer to the disease based on where it’s from? Is that what you mean, @WHO?

Or maybe you just mean the Belt and Road Initiative is wonderful? I’m sure more of that would’ve helped achieve #HealthforAll

I’m sure you’ve got a concert or something to plan but would love to know which of the above advice is still worth believing @WHO & @DrTedros.