I have a few thoughts I'd like to sharing that reconcile the anti-quarantine protests with the polls showing widespread approval for government policies. 1/

Obedience to the law is bottomed on basically three motives.

(1) A conviction that the law is reasonable, just, and in the public interest.
(2) The lure of rewards one can acquire for obeying the law.
(3) The fear of penalties for disobeying the law.

All three of these are why such an overwhelming majority of Americans voluntarily file income taxes.
—They believe that it is right to do so.
—They expect refund.
—They fear IRS penalties.

For civil society to function, you have to have a very, very, very large percentage of the people who follow the law for at least one of these three reasons

Even if a majority continue to approve of the quarantines, a minority can effectively threaten a veto if they are unmoved by one of these three factors.

Are we at that point yet? No, of course not. But one cannot presume that people will indefinitely obey laws that they think are unjust and harmful to themselves ... absent draconian penalties that incentivize them to keep quiet.

Personally, I remain economically unaffected by the quarantine. Psychologically, it has been very rough. And I am very frustrated by the fact that everybody at all levels of government seems to be making this up as they go.

You throw into the mix for many people continued economic harm, and extend these harms through the next couple weeks ... yeah, that's a potential problem.

tl;dr: Obedience to the law is not like a first-past-the-post election, where the majority gets what it wants. A sizable, angry minority can cause extreme disruption if it believes the penalties from protesting are less than the harm for continued obedience.