Dear @follow2deep2,
First of all, I appreciate your writing on Darwin's Theory of Evolution and the Dashavatar. It definetly takes good amount of research to prepare such a thread. Kudos!!!
However, I do not feel right with respect to your content. https://twitter.com/follow2deep2/status/1254312691184791552
@follow2deep2,I may not be as learned as you are and therefore, I am sharing my point of view. If I am wrong, please correct me. I went through the entire thread of yours and observed that it mainly dictates that Sanatan dharma, knew of evolution before "Darwin's Theory".
@follow2deep2 My objection starts from this comparison itself. I believe that these are two different things and cannot be compared. Moreover, "Dashavataram" has nothing to do with "Evolution" aspect.
@follow2deep2, Please allow me to point out few things: -
1.Purpose of "Dashavataram" is highlighting the avataras to be taken by Lord Vishnu in maintaining the Dharma on this earth.
2.The first avatar of lord vishnu - which is matsya avatar took place during the time of King Manu.
@follow2deep2 , 3.Lord vishnu came to King Manu in the form of a Fish to help him, the saptarishis and other forms of life from the "Pralay" - The Great Flood.
@follow2deep2 http://4.Post  saving them, King Manu was entrusted with the responsibility of populating the earth with his progeny and establish dharma.
@follow2deep2 5.If as per your thread the humans evolved, then who was King Manu and the saptarishis? If they were humans, there is no point of any further evolution.
@follow2deep2 6."Kurma" avatar had nothing to do with proving that evolution took place from fish to reptile that could walk on land and swim in water.
@follow2deep2 7."Kurma" avatar took place so that the mountain Mandara could be placed on top of the "Kurma" - "tortoise" so as to help the devas and asuras to churn the ocean.
@follow2deep2 http://8.Post  churning of mountain, there has been no mention of tortoise coming to the land.
@follow2deep2 , 9.For "Varaha" avatar, you wrote as - "The reason is that Boar belongs to the Suina family whose maxillary or teeth are in front and therefore they do not have to swallow and regurgitate their food just like us humans!
@follow2deep2 It’s extremely enlightening to note that Hinduism had such a very insightful knowhow thousands of years ago."
10.The above point mentioned by you for "Varaha" avatar is not at all clear again.
@follow2deep2, 11."Darwin's Theory" in itself is utterly confusing and some scientists do say that this theory has not been proven.
12.Therefore, drawing any sort of comparison of "Dashavatar" with that of "Darwin's Theory" doesn't even make any sense.
@follow2deep2 , http://13.In  this link - " https://twitter.com/follow2deep2/status/1254312723032076288" where you showcased collage of the dashavatara - there is no mention of Lord Sri Krishna. Screenshot attached.
14.Dashavatara, to my understanding and knowledge doesn't mention anything about "Buddha".

Finally, I would conclude by saying, it is absolutely wrong comparing "Dashavatar" with an unproven and cooked up "Darwin's Theory". The theory has not been proven yet.
Please do accept my apologies, just in case, if you felt being hurt by any of my points. I also request you to kindly verify this and let me know if I am wrong any where. I am a learner and would love to rectify my mistake with acknowledgement to you.
You can follow @santoshkumarns7.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: