One of the most troubling bugs in the #gameb code is the idea that sovereignty is a trait cultivated by and in and for individuals.

It seems obvious to me that sovereignty is always cultivated and exercised in relationships.

/thread
My pull request for the emerging #gameb OS is to replace 'sovereignty' with 'mutual sovereignty'.
Perhaps the #metamodern influence will push y'all to think in terms of the transpersonal, of dividuals rather than individuals, to see that living beings are infinitely entangled in webs of mutual obligation and there are no clean boundaries of autonomous selves.
Heck even the postmoderns and SJWs that GameB'ers claim to transcend or bypass will immediately grasp that the primacy of individual autonomous sovereign self is a uniquely masculine, US American, imperialist posture.
I'm wondering when is it time to throw some of these #GameB thinkers into some more difficult conversations instead of the endless series of soft ball interviews they get from @WisdomRebel @FutureThinkers_ @peternlimberg @jim_rutt @dthorson et al.
It's not my job. I don't have the brain for constructing these towering abstractions, but I have enough of a nose for in-group conformity to raise the flag for some more fundamental dissent please.

Where is the arena? Who are the hosts?
You can follow @RichDecibels.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: