I believe the logic behind these lines is highly problematic: that someone with a Chinese background publishing an opinion which is not agreeable should be questioned on whether he is peddling
"false narrative"/disinformation/misinformation/evil-spirited propaganda https://twitter.com/RushDoshi/status/1253657618746355713

I elaborated on a related EU-China matter in a thread, but the point is similar: if someone from Europe or US criticizes Brussels's initial response regarding Italy in the pandemic as very poor, then it's free speech or constructive criticism; BUT https://twitter.com/ZichenWanghere/status/1253765772926685186

BUT if somebody with a Chinese background ever voiced a similar opinion, then it's a state campaign of "false narrative"/disinformation/misinformation aimed at intentionally destabilizing the EU

This logic is flawed.

What should be debated is ONLY the quality of the content

This thread is also worth treading https://twitter.com/scrawnya/status/1253748406327132161