I believe the logic behind these lines is highly problematic: that someone with a Chinese background publishing an opinion which is not agreeable should be questioned on whether he is peddling
"false narrative"/disinformation/misinformation/evil-spirited propaganda https://twitter.com/RushDoshi/status/1253657618746355713">https://twitter.com/RushDoshi...
"false narrative"/disinformation/misinformation/evil-spirited propaganda https://twitter.com/RushDoshi/status/1253657618746355713">https://twitter.com/RushDoshi...
I elaborated on a related EU-China matter in a thread, but the point is similar: if someone from Europe or US criticizes Brussels& #39;s initial response regarding Italy in the pandemic as very poor, then it& #39;s free speech or constructive criticism; BUT https://twitter.com/ZichenWanghere/status/1253765772926685186">https://twitter.com/ZichenWan...
BUT if somebody with a Chinese background ever voiced a similar opinion, then it& #39;s a state campaign of "false narrative"/disinformation/misinformation aimed at intentionally destabilizing the EU
This logic is flawed.
What should be debated is ONLY the quality of the content
This logic is flawed.
What should be debated is ONLY the quality of the content
This thread is also worth treading https://twitter.com/scrawnya/status/1253748406327132161">https://twitter.com/scrawnya/...