this may be a dumb question but if the NY antibody tests are anything close to right it suggests that the fatality rate may actually be way closer to the flu right? in which case uh where does that leave us from a policy perspective

I guess my question is to what extent is it inherently deadlier vs. it spreading more suddenly than the flu having meant that the most severe cases aren't getting the medical care they otherwise would? i dunno https://twitter.com/kagemusha_/status/1253706968038084608?s=20

i have learned that i was probably right to preface the original tweet the way i did