Read on Twitter
Meghans lawyer: “suggested that the defendant had attempted to cause “maximum damage” to the duchess’ reputation”Also Meghans lawyer: “It’s all about distress, it’s not about damage to reputation.”
Meghans’ Lawyer: “her “vulnerable” father, 75, was “harassed and humiliated”, “manipulated” and “exploited”Meghans’ Lawyer: “Meghan hasn't spoken to her dad Thomas, 75, since she and Prince Harry, 35, tied the knot in May 2018”
(Own thoughts)They claim that it’s the media’s fault, that her dad was manipulated, vulnerable, exploited etc. If you know it wasn’t his fault, why haven’t you spoken to him in 2 years? Why did you send him a strongly worded letter when you know he was manipulated?
(Own thoughts)They said that they texted him before the wedding when they found out he was hospitalised and in bad health but Thomas didn’t respond. He had a HEART ATTACK, I’m not sure why they were expecting him to message them back when he was laid up waiting for surgery...
... Meghan asked in the texts if he wanted a security team to meet him. Why on earth would he need a security team at the hospital? What he needed was support and probably just a hug from his daughter. Some kind words even would have done the trick
