Everything @Gil_Hoffman writes here can only be true if Gantz didn’t mean anything he said this the past year.

Gantz’s problem with Netanyahu wasn’t his acting classes or make up. The question is has he changed his mind about real issues of substance.

Here are 3 examples: https://twitter.com/gil_hoffman/status/1253542772637925377

1) Gantz said the submarine scandal was the most serious national security scandal in the history of the country and demanded a state committee of inquiry. Is he now willing to overlook that? Is it no longer serious or no longer important? Has he forgiven Netanyahu for that?

2) Gantz said it is morally and practically wrong for an indicted Prime Minister (and one on trial) to serve. Does he no longer believe Netanyahu is morally unfit for office? Does he longer believe his legal troubles cast doubt on all his decision making?

3) Gantz compared Netanyahu to Erdogan because he said he was a threat to Israeli democracy. Does he no longer believe that or is he just willing to partner with an autocrat?