Read on Twitter
Indians still whining about 'foreign hands favoring Pakistan on Kashmir'. Let me take apart the inaccuracies in this article one by one:
1. How can you complain to UN of not enforcing Resolution 47 when Nehru in Aug 1953 had agreed to a plebiscite (cotd) https://www.fortuneindia.com/opinion/india-pak-ties-whither-international-community/103755
1. How can you complain to UN of not enforcing Resolution 47 when Nehru in Aug 1953 had agreed to a plebiscite (cotd) https://www.fortuneindia.com/opinion/india-pak-ties-whither-international-community/103755
1...a plebiscite with Bogra? There was no condition there of Pakistan "vacating its aggression".
2. It is a blatant lie that Nehru called off this commitment with Bogra due to US Military Aid to Pakistan in Feb 1954. He had called it off in September 1953. Where was the aid then?
2. It is a blatant lie that Nehru called off this commitment with Bogra due to US Military Aid to Pakistan in Feb 1954. He had called it off in September 1953. Where was the aid then?
2. In fact, US had favored India in 1947 during the war and India also received aid from them. Why object to Pakistan receiving aid and American 'partiality' in 54?
3. 'Legal and binding' Instrument of Accession is heavily refuted by Hari Singh's own PM, Mahajan.
3. 'Legal and binding' Instrument of Accession is heavily refuted by Hari Singh's own PM, Mahajan.
3. The Instrument was under coercion in presence of Indian Military which was there by mid-october 47 at least. Week before tribesmen came in.
4. The point about Modi taking a hard stance because of inaction of international community is ridiculous defence of Hindu nationalism.
4. The point about Modi taking a hard stance because of inaction of international community is ridiculous defence of Hindu nationalism.
Full details along with references here: https://pakistanbibliophiles.home.blog/2019/10/21/review-husain-haqqanis-views-on-kashmir-conflict-in-india-vs-pakistan-2016/
