Read on Twitter
The simple, accurate, anti-WHO name for the disease is SARS2, full stop.
This is not just a political decision. There& #39;s a ton of data on SARS1 that& #39;s useful to keep in the public health frame for this disease.
For example, broad presence of ground glass opacity was characteristic/diagnostic for SARS1 patients. https://twitter.com/slovborg/status/1253295338259169280">https://twitter.com/slovborg/...
SARS2 expresses more viral load than SARS (explaining its high infectiousness), and has a narrower range of inflammatory factors/cytokines elevated by it, which explains its lower average severity, but despite differences- many many similarities. https://twitter.com/toad_spotted/status/1253066293688885249">https://twitter.com/toad_spot...
Scientists and doctors are discovering a great deal about SARS2 over these few months, but an understanding of SARS1 is extremely informative about what we can expect about transmission as well as disease progression. https://twitter.com/turnbolt11/status/1253344954958655488">https://twitter.com/turnbolt1...
The SARS2 virus itself is much like SARS and close bat relatives of SARS. https://twitter.com/toad_spotted/status/1224364446434385925">https://twitter.com/toad_spot...
Treatment for SARS didn& #39;t produce any slam-dunks, but still is a useful source of possibilities. https://twitter.com/squid_o_war/status/1247567085330366465">https://twitter.com/squid_o_w...
