Read on Twitter
I think this is a bit of a straw-man and misrepresentation. This is a common argument I’d like to refute.
Being a “docile tradwife” does not make a woman more feminine or worthy. Women are the “apostolate of being” or, put in another way, we simply ARE women... (cont.) https://twitter.com/notabananaanna/status/1252852223916163077
Being a “docile tradwife” does not make a woman more feminine or worthy. Women are the “apostolate of being” or, put in another way, we simply ARE women... (cont.) https://twitter.com/notabananaanna/status/1252852223916163077
...whereas men have to BECOME men. The beauty, mystery, and sacredness of being a woman does not have to be earned like manhood does.
Than being said, we do not need to become docile tradwifes to embrace our femininity. BUT the traditional role of wife and mother... (cont.)
Than being said, we do not need to become docile tradwifes to embrace our femininity. BUT the traditional role of wife and mother... (cont.)
... is the role that women were made for, and it’s the role that shows the most deference and appreciation for what a woman is.
THEREFORE it’s the most dignified role a woman can have, because it intrinsically values her femininity.
THEREFORE it’s the most dignified role a woman can have, because it intrinsically values her femininity.
So do Traditionslists think women who aren’t tradwives are less than? NO! It’s impossible! Women simply are. We simply believe that tradwivery best embraces and reflects that intrinsic feminine beauty.
