Read on Twitter
Feel free to laugh but he raises a point I've harped in public since 2006. @US_CYBERCOM exhibits the same flaw that ripped apart Air Force Communications Command:
1/3 You can't be a "warfighting domain" when you're ALSO a key component to every other warfighting domain... https://twitter.com/Chuck_Petras/status/1252962465760997379
1/3 You can't be a "warfighting domain" when you're ALSO a key component to every other warfighting domain... https://twitter.com/Chuck_Petras/status/1252962465760997379
2/3 @US_CYBERCOM is unlike any other COCOM. We view cyber as a force like gravity when in fact both cyber & gravity are *properties* of the world around us.
Hence @US_SpaceCom must employ a whole division of cyber troops when it only needs a *liaison* from other COCOMs...
Hence @US_SpaceCom must employ a whole division of cyber troops when it only needs a *liaison* from other COCOMs...
3/3 @US_SpaceCom's cyber troops follow dotted lines to @US_CYBERCOM -- or is it the other way around?
That's why Air Force Communications Command ripped apart at its dotted lines:
They viewed "comm" as a force to be reckoned with, when in fact it's a property of warfighting.
That's why Air Force Communications Command ripped apart at its dotted lines:
They viewed "comm" as a force to be reckoned with, when in fact it's a property of warfighting.
