Imagine that you were someone who had built a career on new models of leadership, particularly women& #39;s leadership, as a force for cultural change and revolution.
That you& #39;d spent a decade supporting diverse talent and training against bias in professional environments.
That you& #39;d spent a decade supporting diverse talent and training against bias in professional environments.
Now imagine that you& #39;d sold a book on women& #39;s leadership as a force for revolutionary change at work and in the world.
Along comes coronavirus, which as we all know, changes *everything* related to where and how we work, childcare, education, medicine, productivity, advancement
Along comes coronavirus, which as we all know, changes *everything* related to where and how we work, childcare, education, medicine, productivity, advancement
EVERYTHING.
Imagine the book was, let& #39;s call it, 2/3 done when corona hit. And it was good, but conditioned for an environment *before* a pandemic ripped the veil off everything that& #39;s wrong with our culture and society in stark terms, with no exit in sight.
Imagine the book was, let& #39;s call it, 2/3 done when corona hit. And it was good, but conditioned for an environment *before* a pandemic ripped the veil off everything that& #39;s wrong with our culture and society in stark terms, with no exit in sight.
Would you scrap the book and start over? Or do your best to revise and assume a potential "new normal" that includes people working in non-remote and face/face ways at some point in the unknowable future?
And just for the record: it& #39;s a good book, a really good book. It& #39;s just not quite where we are now, when every inequity is so much more fucking obvious, and when everything is different, and who knows where we& #39;ll be in six months yadda yadda existential writer angst. /end
I mean, honestly, one opinion I would trust on this query implicitly would be @theferocity. He& #39;s summed up what it means to try to write a book in this environment perfectly.