Someone should remind this author there are a number of important, and critical points he missed.
Consuming And Creating Digital Media In The Era Of COVID-19: Copyright Rules To Remember https://www.marketscreener.com/APPLE-INC-4849/news/Consuming-And-Creating-Digital-Media-In-The-Era-Of-COVID-19-Copyright-Rules-To-Remember-30450226/
Consuming And Creating Digital Media In The Era Of COVID-19: Copyright Rules To Remember https://www.marketscreener.com/APPLE-INC-4849/news/Consuming-And-Creating-Digital-Media-In-The-Era-Of-COVID-19-Copyright-Rules-To-Remember-30450226/
Fair Dealing includes (as of 2012): research, private study, criticism, review, news reporting, education, satire or parody, not just the four (4) mentioned in the article.
Additionally, "fair dealing — and users’ rights — are to be given a large and liberal interpretation"...
Additionally, "fair dealing — and users’ rights — are to be given a large and liberal interpretation"...
as per the SOCAN v. Bell and Access Copyright v. Alberta decisions. Stating "The fair dealing exemption has strict conditions for its application that are set out both in the Act itself and in the jurisprudence that has developed in this area" gives the wrong impression to...
readers. As a musician, librarian, and budding copyright scholar, this last piece of advice is just...? As per CCH, para. 73 "If a question arises as to whether the stated purpose is legitimate, the Reference Librarian will review the matter. The Access Policy limits the...
amount of work that will be copied, and the Reference Librarian reviews requests that exceed what might typically be considered reasonable and has the right to refuse to fulfill a request." Save yourself time and money by asking or reading the writings of copyright specialists...
( @mgeist, @strosow, @howardknopf, @lisadivalentino, @LJGDAlton) or a copyright librarian, not as the author recommends "collective society or a lawyer" (though some of the fine people listed above are lawyers, and hence this does not apply to them) as they are primarily risk...
adverse thereby continuing to protect the status quo, and not necessarily for pushing for the public good of supporting and balancing creators rights with those of users.