Read on Twitter
Please, please report and block this account. They’re making copies of real polaroids and signing/drawing on them to make them look real. They’re copying broadcast cards (and even the back??? WHY?!?!) THIS IS NOT OKAY do u know now many atiny are going to get scammed
Someone is going to buy from her and then resell for full market value and there will be atinys paying hundreds of dollars for fake merch— she might not be selling them as real but how can anyone think it’s okay to make replicas of limited items???
And to copy the back too?? You can’t at least leave it blank so it’s obvious it’s a replica? You have to copy the back too???
I smell the scammers already.
I smell the scammers already.
https://twitter.com/wooisms/status/1252859505274007552?s=21">https://twitter.com/wooisms/s... https://twitter.com/wooisms/status/1252859505274007552">https://twitter.com/wooisms/s...
I have messaged the seller on Instagram to ask her to remove the items and stop selling, however, it appears she’s been doing this for a long time.
Even though most items are cheap, she is still profiting from this!! At 1€ for a pola and/or photocard, if she orders printed stacks of around 500 that still only costs her around 50€ maximum (qty 1600 double sided full color business cards in the us cost me $65 with shipping)
So she is still making a massive profit
SHE FIFKEBSKSJS SHE COPIED MMT PHOTOCARDS?? ARE U SERIOUS??
CONFIRMED SHE IS USING OTHER PEOPLES POLAROIDS TO PRINT these they aren’t even hers, she’s effectively fucking over anyone whose Polaroid she’s reproducing what the fuck kfheoshdidhs IM SO ANGRY
Be careful about all of those ep 1 group orders that have been popping up recently
Can I even trust listings anymore???
It’s even worse that they look legitimate??
They’re on twitter— I...
These are her treasure cafe copies
So she read my message to her, didn’t respond, and went private??
She knows and clearly doesn’t care that what she is doing is fraud
She knows and clearly doesn’t care that what she is doing is fraud
So because you can’t afford it that’s reason to make forgeries??
I also can’t afford to buy the Mona Lisa. That doesn’t give me the right to make copies and sell it.
Also, proof above that she was using someone’s pola without even asking.
I also can’t afford to buy the Mona Lisa. That doesn’t give me the right to make copies and sell it.
Also, proof above that she was using someone’s pola without even asking.
Adding this from my other thread rant about fake polaroids and photocards - please take time to learn about copyright and how this harms artists (ateez) and collectors of official items https://twitter.com/wooisms/status/1252932169124601862?s=21">https://twitter.com/wooisms/s... https://twitter.com/wooisms/status/1252932169124601862">https://twitter.com/wooisms/s...
Ok so some people are saying she’s not drawing on the pcs, just literally printing multiple copies, however you feel about this is up to you but it’s still shady imo - and doesn’t change the fact that she is still reproducing copyrighted items
The minute I found out one of my items could be mistaken for an official item I stopped selling it. Point blank. Period. Changing the design a little is not good enough. If someone owns the copyright to those items you have NO RIGHT to sell them or make profit from it.
If you are honestly still defending this l, here u go
Watermark is blocked out on the first photo because the pola was sold to someone else and I had to look for it. This photo was posted by the first owner. The new owner did not have permission to reprint and sell this.
Watermark is blocked out on the first photo because the pola was sold to someone else and I had to look for it. This photo was posted by the first owner. The new owner did not have permission to reprint and sell this.
*give - the new owner did not give permission to reprint this
And yet another one...
And I’ll post this here too since it seems to be a common argument...
Recreating an item based on something else that is of a completely different media is called art btw, such as painting an artist based on a photo or in my case, creating jewelry.
Recreating an item based on something else that is of a completely different media is called art btw, such as painting an artist based on a photo or in my case, creating jewelry.
The restricted tweet here was mentioning the NCT necklaces I have, which you’ll also notice I thanked her for, immediately researched, and announced that I would not be selling them due to copyright issues - and why would I sell something that a buyer can resell
At exorbitant rates as authentic. I would not do that.
So you’re welcome to come scream at me all you would like, it doesn’t change the fact that ateez signatures are not copyrighted? And I’ve created the necklaces BASED ON public photos... they’re not exact replicas and there
So you’re welcome to come scream at me all you would like, it doesn’t change the fact that ateez signatures are not copyrighted? And I’ve created the necklaces BASED ON public photos... they’re not exact replicas and there
Is no danger of anyone buying them thinking ateez really signed in the air with silver
The fact that she has removed watermarks from people’s polaroids so she can reprint and sell them makes me livid. Be creative and make unofficial cards. I know she does. They’re gorgeous too. Why the need to remake official copyrighted album contents (this is like people
reprinting their own japan photosets from pictures online and selling them-) its not okay!
The majority of this thread came because she posted my acct on Instagram and asked her followers to come clear her name,,
