A plea to experts: when a journalist reaches out to you about your general field, even if they& #39;re asking things you don& #39;t know the precise answer to, ANSWER! And quickly! Even "we don& #39;t know for sure yet, it depends on whether x and y are true" is useful!
Don& #39;t put the email on a "to answer well when I have time" list. Because they need it now, and if you don& #39;t, someone ignorant but full of confidence may get quoted instead. Your expert uncertainty is a valuable input to public information!
Anyway this is me nagging my team members to not skip replying to journalist emails because they don& #39;t have *all* the answers. But it applies much more widely too.
Replies more useful than silence: " I have no idea", "I have never heard of that thing supposedly in my field so maybe it is not a *major* thing", "buggered if I know".
Anyway what& #39;s the worst that could happen? You get quoted expressing uncertainty or giving a background comment? You wrote a short email to no immediate personal gain?