Read on Twitter
Tweet is false/misleading, as usual
THREAD https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1252617751044259841
THREAD https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1252617751044259841
The Senate Intel Committee didn’t find a well constructed basis for the Putin preference for Trump
It found the ICA presented a “well-constructed intelligence basis for the case of unprecedented Russian interference in the election”, which everyone already knew already
It found the ICA presented a “well-constructed intelligence basis for the case of unprecedented Russian interference in the election”, which everyone already knew already
It only found that ICA “presented information” and “specific intelligence reporting” about the so-called Putin preference for Trump. Not that they agreed with the information itself, or “the case” for that conclusion, just that the ICA wasn’t based on literally nothing. Er, ok?
The Senate Intel report also confirms that the only conclusion in the ICA where there was a “different confidence level” between agencies was that so-called preference for Trump, and that this “difference” was JUSTIFIED
And finally, the most important thing is what is not mentioned: the most senior career intel officer for Russia had zero evidence of Collusion. Zero. And she told the Senate this on May 9 2017. Nearly three years ago, and months before the 2018 mid terms
I’m glad MSM reporting on the Russia case is improving. This is like being stuck in a permanent time warp
/ENDS
/ENDS
