1/9
Grades do an inadequate job at predicting what student's intellectual capabilities are or even if they "understand" the material

Previous students that had low grades are now educators, accountants, have a master's, business owners, or millionaire real estate professionals
2/9
Some students just don't do well on exams; some can't adequately express what they've learned on paper. I know people who have been working at professional institutions for decades, can adequately do their jobs, but will do poorly on a written or multiple choice exam on it
3/9
The overemphasis on grades does takes precedence over comprehensive learning, applied education (to life esp), and personal development for especially young Students of Color, students from a low socioeconomic background, disabled, and those with poor mental health.
4/9
The achievement gap is another example of its inadequacies to evaluate. It also has a lot to do with grading in collaboration with a predominately eurocentric school curriculum, and a marginalized student's place in society that affects how they function that grades overlook.
5/9
I remember being at York U in my 3rd year, and my personality psych professor asked if any of us could recall material from last semester. In a class of approximately 250 students, only 3/4 had their hand up. When she got to 3 semesters ago.. 4 students had their hand up
6/9
I comprehensively learned at a late age that the grading system was a flawed mechanism for feedback on learning, so like most students, I crammed and memorize names and dates to get the decent grades I received in post-secondary. Is this where some high grades come from?
7/9
Many times situations have occurred where business undergraduates & graduates would come into a workplace without the skills to function that they will never develop, but a veteran employee who didn't finish school, low grades, will possess the skills to manage the occupation
8/9
Imagine this -- if both of those individuals applied for the same position increase, who do you think should receive it? Who do you think society/institution will insinuate is more "qualified" to receive the position?
9/9
I am going on a rant.. but my point is that we should find alternative approaches for learning and "evaluating" that isn't stress-inducing, that is fun and that is diverse.
You can follow @JoyeuxH.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: