A Thread on why certain people prefer awb to trent or why people prefer trent to awb....

1. Our full back don't do the same job Liverpool do it's not where our creative comes from never really has been either.
2. Things trent actually good at liking getting forward would be very reduced in his game.
.

3. Report back to number 2 Manchester United don't dominate the ball much as Liverpool so trent will be back peddling alot. Plus be asked to defend properly twice as much and would get beat 9times out of 10

4. Weather ole has style of play or not the current style whatever you want to call it trent doesn't fit.

Why Liverpool fans prefer him and other fans..

1. They style of play trent plays i.e his crossing ability helps. Plus awb nowhere as him going forward so he'd aslo struggle half way up the pitch himself.
2. His two wingers play more as inside. forwards which allows him to basically hog the touchline on the wing

3. Trent alot more attacking and in dominate side help Liverpool way more than having a Rb like awb.
4. Klopp style of play is attacking/counter attacking but i could be wrong

Teams like: Barcelona, Real Madrid, Dortmund, Inter - would take a player like trent.

Teams like: Juventus,Psg,s.s.c. napoli, Lazio - would take a player like awb

I mention these teams because in terms of the way each team use the fullback if you was swap them both around.. Both players weakness would be exposed in both teams.

Can't really argue who's better because in system/style of play they'll become ineffective.

Hope this helps both as good as each other both still have weakness in der game until they both work it i think that's when he can really start comparing who's really better. In the next per say two years

End of thread.