Read on Twitter
Based on the current lifespan of team rosters and the format of our scene’s tourneys, a simple “power ranking” for the top 30 - 50 NA teams would honestly be plausible if done quarterly
We have pretty numerous weekly tourneys which give a plethora of results, and rosters would
We have pretty numerous weekly tourneys which give a plethora of results, and rosters would
remain fairly consistent throughout each quarter (hopefully a power ranking would also help to incentivize less roster changing)
Using a tournament listing like the one Kbot has and interviewing teams for potential placement, a solid picture would be painted for each team
Using a tournament listing like the one Kbot has and interviewing teams for potential placement, a solid picture would be painted for each team
After that, we establish a spreadsheet (or a few spreadsheets) containing head to head records for each team using that same specific team name (establishing that if a drastic roster change occurred, then only matchups AFTER the roster change occurred would count)
Factoring in SAC tourneys wouldn’t be a problem because, again, basing things on head-to-head records as well as consistency over time
Getting a panel together, rank the players and do some mathematical shenaniganeries to determine the final power rankings, done each quarter
Getting a panel together, rank the players and do some mathematical shenaniganeries to determine the final power rankings, done each quarter
For those of you that are tired of LUTI and crave a new system, if you’re honestly interested in something like this then interact with this tweet or something
it’s late and I need sleep but I need to get thoughts in the open
Let’s make something happen instead of complaining
it’s late and I need sleep but I need to get thoughts in the open
Let’s make something happen instead of complaining
https://twitter.com/Magic_Octo/status/1252662574052769797?s=20">https://twitter.com/Magic_Oct... can yall go to this thread pls and thx
