Read on Twitter
Okay. Let's pretend, as you claim, that I am indeed a journalist. How do you think a journalist would respond to someone who sent them a video that they didn't request, and then the person flipped out when the journalist didn't write a story about it immediately? https://twitter.com/jondelarroz/status/1252379469899157505
What would a journalist think if this person then recruited other people to badger him on Twitter about said video? What would he think if these people named a person the requester has a known problem with as the subject of the investigation?
What would a journalist think if these people, including the requester, then publicly accused him of being a paid hack writing articles for clicks and being fearful of this person's enemies solely because the journalist had not written an article about said video yet?
I would think a journalist would find such actions, and by proxy the requester's accusations, suspect. A journalist might even think this person was trying to trick him or use him as a tool to attack the requester's enemies.
I don't think any journalist would drop every story he was working on to focus on this random person's accusations, especially when that person keeps pestering him about it. I think a journalist would be very cautious before writing anything.
So if you're confused about why I'm not jumping at your beck and call, it's because that's unethical, and your behavior makes you look dishonest, Jon. You burned a bridge you didn't need to burn because you have a hate boner for EVS.
If you have evidence against EVS and war campaign, present the evidence. You don't demand that someone with more subs do it for you, and you damn sure don't flip out when they don't drop everything they're doing to focus on you.
