Read on Twitter
1) 
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="💥" title="Collision symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Collision symbol">THREAD - origin of the virushttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="💥" title="Collision symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Collision symbol">
Perhaps the following article is the reason why General Mark A. Milley has a dilemma and says the “weight of evidence” with regard to SARS-CoV-2 points to a “natural” origin but overall is “inconclusive”.
#QAnon #MAGA #WWG1WGA #POTUS
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👉" title="Right pointing backhand index" aria-label="Emoji: Right pointing backhand index">
Perhaps the following article is the reason why General Mark A. Milley has a dilemma and says the “weight of evidence” with regard to SARS-CoV-2 points to a “natural” origin but overall is “inconclusive”.
#QAnon #MAGA #WWG1WGA #POTUS
2) The crucial “evidence” from my memory is contained in the following paper: https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👇" title="Down pointing backhand index" aria-label="Emoji: Down pointing backhand index"> https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.22.914952v2">https://www.biorxiv.org/content/1...
3) The salient point in the paper is as follows:
“The same sequences are found in a variant called BetaCoV/bat/Yunnan/RaTG13/2013, which had been found ‘in the wild’ in bats.”
“The same sequences are found in a variant called BetaCoV/bat/Yunnan/RaTG13/2013, which had been found ‘in the wild’ in bats.”
4) In other words the Chinese are saying that the SARS-CoV-2 originated in the wild because a very similar strain was found in bats in 2013.
Thus it is a missing link or step between say SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 and hence natural mutation accounts for this otherwise massive leap.
Thus it is a missing link or step between say SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 and hence natural mutation accounts for this otherwise massive leap.
5) Trouble is this paper was published on 23rd January 2020https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❗️" title="Red exclamation mark symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Red exclamation mark symbol">
This intermediate virus had never been acknowledged or published beforehandhttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❗️" title="Red exclamation mark symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Red exclamation mark symbol">
So a hugely unique and potentially dangerous virus was NEVER announced until AFTER the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was in full steamhttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❗️" title="Red exclamation mark symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Red exclamation mark symbol">
This intermediate virus had never been acknowledged or published beforehand
So a hugely unique and potentially dangerous virus was NEVER announced until AFTER the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was in full steam
6) Furthermore the 2013 virus was ONLY kept at the Wuhan BL4 Laboratory.
The motive for Wuhan to make up such a “natural” intermediate virus is obvious.
It allays any culpability.
The motive for Wuhan to make up such a “natural” intermediate virus is obvious.
It allays any culpability.
7) So I think this is the crux of the US Military thinking in not being able to conclusively call it a man-made virushttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❗️" title="Red exclamation mark symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Red exclamation mark symbol">
It depends on the veracity of the Wuhan Labhttps://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❗️" title="Red exclamation mark symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Red exclamation mark symbol">
The US Military at this stage has therefore politely been conservative and sided with Wuhan (CCP)https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="❗️" title="Red exclamation mark symbol" aria-label="Emoji: Red exclamation mark symbol">
It depends on the veracity of the Wuhan Lab
The US Military at this stage has therefore politely been conservative and sided with Wuhan (CCP)