Notes:

- As WFH becomes more popular, older/senior employees will vehemently oppose it because most of them don't add enough value to justify their pay

- WFH makes it easier to track individual contribution, will decrease employment because bloat is easier to identify

- For many people, their jobs are their main source of socialization. WFH will be hard psychologically on people in the long run. (Especially for people who live without family - western world)

- WFH will naturally enable segmentation of work, good for future automation.

- Some people will find creative ways to make more money, for example holding two jobs at once. Or outsourcing their jobs to others at a cheaper rate and pocketing the difference.

- Rise of freelancers and reduction in full time employees (needs more thought)

- WFH for women:

Skilled women will find it easier to raise children and work at the same time (easier to work part time / freelance)

(Incompetent) women who relied on their sexuality to rise suffer.

Probably for the best

Safer to hire women now, no more false #metoo nonsense

- WFH for men:

Incompetent but good at office politics guys will reduce in numbers.

More recluses, low socialization.

- WFH will be good for the environment, but will impact many industries negatively.

For example, oil and gas (and tax collections from the same) [and the auto sector in general], takeout food, formal apparel, taxis and transporation, etc.

Interesting take: https://twitter.com/brogram_/status/1250706694184808448

Interesting take: https://twitter.com/Betatopua/status/1250712427349585926