Read on Twitter
To branch rather than hijacking someone else& #39;s conversation or confusing my other thread, there is a context where a Minimum Viable Product makes logical sense: 1/n https://twitter.com/ncdominie/status/1250471865405116417">https://twitter.com/ncdominie...
1. You think it& #39;s more useful to get feedback on a rough draft of your product than on a more polished version. "Feedback" can mean a lot of different things. Examples are, "Do people want to buy this at all?" or "Is X more important to them than Y?" 2/n
2. You can change your product fast in response to the feedback you get. 3/n
3. Your customers are willing and/or able to consume a lot of changes in a short amount of time. 4/n
MVP has left its original land of lean startup to mean other things, so I shouldn& #39;t be surprised it& #39;s been taken up by education. But it& #39;s worth asking "Is this what you mean by MVP, and do we believe these conditions hold?" 5/n
I& #39;m starting to hear the mathematician voice in my head, so that is the end of this thread. (cc @ncdominie) /fin
I finish a thread about MVPs and along comes an idea that is the perfect example of a thing where someone should build the damn prototype and try to sell it to find out if anyone (besides @ksonney) wants one: https://twitter.com/hamiltonnolan/status/1250258752739192832">https://twitter.com/hamiltonn...
