Yesterday CJCS Gen Milley contradicted SECDEF Esper on the all important question of military hair regulations during a pandemic. This led to a social media furor. For those of you new to the military hair debate, welcome. So what's the deal with hair???
Short hair took on a strong cultural salience during the Vietnam War when long haired hippies led anti-war protest movements. As the post-Vietnam force moved to all volunteer, hair became an important visual separation btwn conscripted forces & the new professional military.
This movement towards short hair as a proxy for discipline in the all volunteer force did not come without a debate. Enter "wig wars" where reservists sued for the right to wear wigs & retain long hair they argued was vital to their civilian identity.

https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/duqu12&div=24&id=&page=
Finally, hair regulations have always revealed how the military views the role of women in combat--whether it be regulations about length, the girth of a bun, the appropriate color, or whether to allow ponytails. Check out Emerald Archer's amazing book:
https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/women-warfare-and-representation-9781474238045/
How did I learn so much about military culture & hair? A few years ago I published a piece called blue hair in the gray zone in which I argued our beliefs about what a warrior should look like would keep us from developing the best force of the future. https://warontherocks.com/2018/01/blue-hair-gray-zone/
I have never received so much reaction from an opinion piece. When I put up a display about the future force at the Naval War College w/blue haired sailors & man-bunned soldiers, I was asked by public affairs to remove the dolls. They didn't want to condone loose grooming stds.
You can follow @JackieGSchneid.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: