Thread against the argument “Sita Agnipariksha was added later in the ending of Yuddhakanda & there is no description of this incident in Mahabharata & in Baalakanda”

This Thread exposes all those who argue that Agnipariksha is just an interpolation.

(1/n)

“Agnipariksha was added later in the end of Yuddhakanda”. This argument is false because there is a mention of Agnipariksha in the Baalakanda at the starting of the Ramayana

(2/n)

There is a clear description of Rama's doubts about Sita and the purification statement of Sita by Vayu, Agni etc. Devtas and Brahma ji - in रामोपाख्यान of MB

(3/n) https://twitter.com/SumitNitian/status/1250426825450205187?s=20

Padma Purana, Uttarakanda and Mahabharat about Agnipariksha:

(4/n)

All these evidences proves that Agnipariksha is not an interpolated part but it is mentioned in both Valmiki Ramayan and Mahabharat.

(5/n)