I'll be a bit vulnerable here. I don't know where I'm going. Theologically. On the one hand, I hold strongly to the classical protestant notion of justification. On the other hand, I hold a view of the sacraments so high that it would make most protestants uncomfortable. 1/

It's clear IMO from Scripture and the fathers that baptism is efficacious for the forgiveness of sins and the reception of the Holy Spirit at the time of administration. The Eucharist is the true body and blood of Christ. I have no problem with benediction services. 2/

The notion of eucharistic sacrifice (understood as anamnesis, the bringing forth of the sufficient, once-for-all sacrifice of Christ) is both biblical and patristic. The historic order of ministry, bishop priest and deacon were adopted almost immediately after the death of 3/

the apostles. The authority of the apostles was handed down to their successors through the laying on of hands, consecrating bishops. The deposit of faith is also handed down through apostolic succession. It's better IMO to count seven sacraments, but not to be dogmatic about 4/

how many we number. I believe in the unique primacy and sufficiency of Holy Scripture, yet at the same time believe that Holy Tradition is a derivative authority that is necessary for the faith and life of the church.

I have no idea where I'm going to end up. It's especially 5/

hard because I have to lead my family down this path as well. /E