Say it with me folks.... "twink" does not automatically mean "feminine" Nor does it automatically mean "submissive"... why do people still not understand that gay nomenclatures like twink/hunk/bear solely refer to body type and have nothing to do with gender expression

To say that only skinny young looking guys can be fem is Wrong and really ignorant, and greatly ignores the fact that hunks, bears, cubs, etc can all present feminine too... Same with twinks being mascs or tops body types have zero impact on gender expression

its always really fucking weird when people try and make the least "manly" built kinds of gay men Submissive Bottoms because your worldview on gay sexuality is so limited and fetishy you cannot even fathom the idea of any form of gay sex outside of the "uke and seme" yaoi formula

if i see one more non-gay conflating twink with being fem or being a sub/bottom im really about to go angry gorilla mode, for a group of people who love to fetishize gay sex and culture you all sure dont give a single shit about Actually learning about the intricacies of gay sex

This is gaining traction and some teenagers are reblogging this so PLEASE be aware im a nsfw account i just Complain here sometimes. while i suppose its good you all want to bump this id rather not have anyone under 18 interact with this post so Be mindful