Why did the Labour Party& #39;s lawyers recommend that the report should not be submitted to the EHRC?

Who are they lawyers for? The Labour Party? Or the saboteurs?
"Here& #39;s a massive report which details appalling, shocking racist behaviour. We advise this report should not be sent to an organisation investigating racist behaviour".

Why? Because it& #39;d blow the EHRC& #39;s investigation sky high? Because it& #39;d expose what& #39;s REALLY gone on here?
What& #39;s REALLY gone on here has been known to many of us for a long, long, LONG time.

- Deliberate obstruction and burying of antisemitism complaints under McNicol

- A proper process implemented by Formby

- Those responsible for the obstruction and burying BLAMING Formby
- Politics being played with British Jews by those responsible for obstructing and burying

- Absolute desperation to bury the truth and cover Corbyn and his team in abuse, lies, and complete shit - for the crime of being a left wing leader democratically elected.
One thing I should clarify amid all of this. The report has found cases of antisemitism. Of course it& #39;s existed in the Labour Party as it has in all parties and across society.

The problem is taking a molehill and claiming it& #39;s a mountain for nakedly political reasons.
Someone I know - who shall remain nameless - has always insisted to me that the truth will out. I& #39;ve always questioned whether it truly would; the narrative has been so powerful that it became unchallengeable.

Well. Now& #39;s Starmer& #39;s chance to challenge that narrative.
By using facts and evidence. And cleaning this party from root to tip with soap, water and a wire brush.

Out with corruption. Out with racists. Out with antisemites. Out with facscists. Out with liars. Out with saboteurs.
You can follow @shaunjlawson.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: