Read on Twitter
Opinion here: http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201913843.pdf https://twitter.com/jkbjournalist/status/1250089885186301953
"It’s not a result we like, but it’s the result we think the law requires [...] The facts underlying this case, as we understand them, are beyond scandalous—they tell a tale of national disgrace." http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201913843.pdf
!["It’s not a result we like, but it’s the result we think the law requires [...] The facts underlying this case, as we understand them, are beyond scandalous—they tell a tale of national disgrace." http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201913843.pdf](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EVk5uY8X0AEu8zM.png "\"It’s not a result we like, but it’s the result we think the law requires [...] The facts underlying this case, as we understand them, are beyond scandalous—they tell a tale of national disgrace.\" http://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/201913843.pdf")
There is a lengthy and "respectfully" withering dissent in the opinion finding that federal prosecutors didn't violate the Crime Victims Rights Act when they negotiated a secret plea deal with Jeffrey Epstein:
Correction: non-prosecution agreement, not a plea deal.
If you forgot, the feds mysteriously agreed to drop their sprawling sex trafficking investigation into Epstein and grant him immunity from federal prosecution if he pleaded to two state charges for soliciting prostitutes.
If you forgot, the feds mysteriously agreed to drop their sprawling sex trafficking investigation into Epstein and grant him immunity from federal prosecution if he pleaded to two state charges for soliciting prostitutes.
