Read on Twitter
Seems I did @ASA_UK a disservice suggesting they weren& #39;t taking @FootballIndex seriously. They& #39;ve already found them to be encouraging gambling behaviour that& #39;s socially irresponsible. But I still wonder if they and @GamRegGB fully understand the scale. https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/betindex-ltd-A19-1023204.html">https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/b...
That came after another breach.
https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/betindex-ltd-A19-1020806.html
But">https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/b... neither ruling gets to the heart of the matter, which is how @FootballIndex feel justified to make such claims in the first place, like only "2% tend to lose". The FCA would never permit such a thing. Why do @GamRegGB ?
https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/betindex-ltd-A19-1020806.html
But">https://www.asa.org.uk/rulings/b... neither ruling gets to the heart of the matter, which is how @FootballIndex feel justified to make such claims in the first place, like only "2% tend to lose". The FCA would never permit such a thing. Why do @GamRegGB ?
The reason they feel justified is because it& #39;s probably true, at least in terms of paper trading anyway. But that& #39;s precisely the thing that needs investigating: who is paying for the 98% to be winning?
Now watch the worker wasps swarm as the nest is threatened.
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🤣" title="Rolling on the floor laughing" aria-label="Emoji: Rolling on the floor laughing">
Now watch the worker wasps swarm as the nest is threatened.
