A fair point. Dawkins trades on his reputation as a scientist.

He's noticeably less eager to publicise opposing evidence, the first principle of science.

How often does he tweet about the atheist Chinese Govt and its violent campaigns against religious minorities? https://twitter.com/Adrian_Hilton/status/1249996660035465216

Or how the world's largest and most important atheist, secularist state is still covering up Coronavirus.

Potentially risking the entire rest of the world. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/11/china-clamping-down-on-coronavirus-research-deleted-pages-suggest

Or, more generally, the scientific evidence that Religion is good for people's health and wellbeing. https://www.premierchristianity.com/Blog/Like-it-or-not.-Religion-is-good-for-us

In fact, the whole New Atheist movement wrap themselves in science, but have any of them ever acknowledged this considerable body of evidence?

'Professor' Dawkins trades relentlessly on his reputation as a scientist.

But, no surprise, outside Biology he acts as a biased propagandist, with no respect for the scientific principles he supposedly holds so dear.

The Chinese Communist Party is officially atheist and secularist, as all sources agree.

Another Atheist and 'scientist' who bothers to lie about a trivially provable fact. Why?

Because it's evidence that troubles their faith. https://twitter.com/PBDerbysAtheist/status/1250011509113212933?s=19

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_atheism?wprov=sfla1