A fair point. Dawkins trades on his reputation as a scientist.

He& #39;s noticeably less eager to publicise opposing evidence, the first principle of science.

How often does he tweet about the atheist Chinese Govt and its violent campaigns against religious minorities? https://twitter.com/Adrian_Hilton/status/1249996660035465216">https://twitter.com/Adrian_Hi...

Or how the world& #39;s largest and most important atheist, secularist state is still covering up Coronavirus.

Potentially risking the entire rest of the world. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/11/china-clamping-down-on-coronavirus-research-deleted-pages-suggest">https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp...

Or, more generally, the scientific evidence that Religion is good for people& #39;s health and wellbeing. https://www.premierchristianity.com/Blog/Like-it-or-not.-Religion-is-good-for-us">https://www.premierchristianity.com/Blog/Like...

In fact, the whole New Atheist movement wrap themselves in science, but have any of them ever acknowledged this considerable body of evidence?

& #39;Professor& #39; Dawkins trades relentlessly on his reputation as a scientist.

But, no surprise, outside Biology he acts as a biased propagandist, with no respect for the scientific principles he supposedly holds so dear.

The Chinese Communist Party is officially atheist and secularist, as all sources agree.

Another Atheist and & #39;scientist& #39; who bothers to lie about a trivially provable fact. Why?

Because it& #39;s evidence that troubles their faith. https://twitter.com/PBDerbysAtheist/status/1250011509113212933?s=19">https://twitter.com/PBDerbysA...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_atheism?wprov=sfla1">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stat...