Read on Twitter
westworld presents a paradox: how is it possible for something to be consistently disappointing? does the nature of disappointment not preclude such a thing
one issue with any theory dependent on quality is that i don't think earlier episodes are particularly better. maybe S1, but if you asked me if a random S2 episode was better than the last, i'd say probably no.
i think what's happening is: westworld in particular works with concepts that i find fascinating, and then explores them (imo) inadequately.
so while watching an episode, i am struck by the distance b/t what it could be and what it is, and experience disappointment.
so while watching an episode, i am struck by the distance b/t what it could be and what it is, and experience disappointment.
it's difficult to maintain a sense of blah disappointmentâalmost by definition, since it's basically inadequate stimulus.
but it's easy for me to get excited about things i find interesting! in fact, if you get me going on a cognitive tear, i get MORE excited over time.
but it's easy for me to get excited about things i find interesting! in fact, if you get me going on a cognitive tear, i get MORE excited over time.
so: i watch it, i feel disappointed. disappointment is uncomfortable, so to soothe, i dream about more satisfying explorations of the concepts. those bloom in my mindâby the time the next episode rolls around, i have recharged my interest and am ready to be disappointed again.
